Why choose us?

You'll get help from a writer with the qualification you're working towards.

You'll be dealing with a real company offering a legitimate service.

Get help with your essay on world war 1 weapons or assignments today.

Our ethos is to provide the best possible customer service.

The war began in the Balkan cockpit of viing patriotisms and ancient cultural competitions. Hopes that it could be contained at that place proved vain. Expansion of the war was fleet. Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia on 28 July 1914 ; Germany declared war on Russia on 1 August. Germany declared war on France on 3 August and invaded Belgium. France was invaded on 4 August. German misdemeanor of Belgian neutrality provided the British with a convenient alibi to come in the war on the side of France and Russia the same eventide. Austria-Hungary declared war on Russia on 6 August. France and Great Britain declared war on Austria-Hungary six yearss subsequently.

Fears were more of import than aspirations. Of the powers involved in the eruption of war, merely Serbia had a clear expansionist docket. The Gallic hoped to retrieve the states of Alsace and Lorraine lost to Germany as a consequence of their licking in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-1, but this was regarded as an effort at damages instead than acquisition. Otherwise, defensive considerations were paramount. The provinces who embarked on the route to war in 1914 wished to continue what they had. This included non merely their territorial unity but besides their diplomatic confederations and their prestigiousness. These defensive concerns made Europe 's solons take advocate of their frights and submit to the dictatorship of events.

The Austrians feared for the endurance of their multi-racial Empire if they did non face the menace of Serb patriotism and Panslavism. The Germans feared the effects to themselves of leting Austria, their closest and merely dependable ally, to be weakened and humiliated. The Russians feared the menace to their prestigiousness and authorization as defender of the Slavs if they allowed Austria to get the better of and mortify Serbia. The Gallic feared the superior population Numberss, economic resources, and military strength of their German neighbors. France 's chief defense mechanism against the menace of German power was its confederation with Russia. This it was imperative to support. The British feared business of the Low Countries by a hostile power, particularly a hostile power with a big modern naval forces. But most of all they feared for the long-run security of their Empire if they did non back up France and Russia, their chief imperial challengers, whose good will they had been assiduously cultivating for a decennary.

The procedure of enlargement did non stop in August 1914. Other major combatants took their clip and waited upon events. Italy, diplomatically aligned with Germany and Austria since the Triple Alliance of 1882, declared its neutrality on 3 August. In the undermentioned months it was ardently courted by France and Britain. On 23 May 1915 the Italian authorities succumbed to Allied enticements and declared war on Austria-Hungary in chase of territorial aggrandisement in the Trentino. Bulgaria invaded Serbia on 7 October 1915 and sealed that hard-bitten state 's destiny. Serbia was overrun. The route to Constantinople was opened to the Central Powers. Romania prevaricated about which side to fall in, but eventually chose the Allies in August 1916, encouraged by the success of the Russian 'Brusilov Offensive ' . It was a fatal misreckoning. The German response was fleet and decisive. Romania was quickly overwhelmed by two incursive German ground forcess and its rich supplies of wheat and oil did much to maintain Germany in the war for another two old ages. Romania joined Russia as the other Allied power to endure licking in the war.

It was British belligerence, nevertheless, which was cardinal in turning a European struggle into a world war. Britain was the world 's greatest imperial power. The British had global involvements and global quandary. They besides had global friends. Germany found itself at war non merely with Great Britain but besides with the rules of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and South Africa and with the greatest British imperial ownership, India. Concern for the defense mechanism of India helped convey the British into struggle with the Ottoman Empire in November 1914 and resulted in a major war in the Middle East. Most of import of all, possibly, Britain 's close political, economic, and cultural ties with the United States of America, if they did non guarantee that state 's eventual entry into the war, surely made it possible. The American declaration of war on Germany on 6 April 1917 was a landmark non merely in the history of the United States but besides in that of Europe and the world, conveying to an terminal half a millenary of European domination and ushering in 'the American century ' .

The geographical graduated table of the struggle meant that it was non one war but many. On the Western Front in France and Belgium the Gallic and their British Alliess, reinforced from 1917 onwards by the Americans, were locked in a barbarous conflict of abrasion against the German ground forces. Here the war became characterized by progressively luxuriant and sophisticated trench systems and field munitions. Dense belts of barbed wire, concrete toques, crossing discharge of machine-gun fire, and roll uping multitudes of quick-firing field and heavy heavy weapon rendered manœuvre virtually impossible. Casualties were tremendous.

The first stage of the war in the West lasted until November 1914. This witnessed Germany 's effort to get the better of France through an enveloping motion round the left wing of the Gallic ground forcess. The program met with initial success. The progress of the German ground forcess through Belgium and northern France was dramatic. The Gallic, reacting with an violative in Lorraine, suffered an about ruinous national licking. France was saved by the Fe nervus of its commander-in-chief, General J. J. C. Joffre, who had non merely the intelligence but besides the strength of character to untangle himself from the ruin of his programs and order the historic counter-attack against the German right wing, the 'miracle of the Marne ' . The German ground forcess were forced to withdraw and to intrench. Their last effort at a discovery was stopped by Gallic and British forces near the little Flemish market town of Ypres in November. By Christmas 1914 trench lines stretched from the Belgian seashore to the Swiss frontier.

Although the events of 1914 did non ensue in a German triumph, they left the Germans in a really strong place. The German ground forces held the strategic enterprise. It was free to withdraw to places of tactical advantage and to reenforce them with all the accomplishment and inventiveness of German military technology. Enormous losingss had been inflicted on France. Two-fifths of France 's military casualties were incurred in 1914. These included a ten percent of the officer corps. German military personnels occupied a big country of northern France, including a important proportion of Gallic industrial capacity and mineral wealth.

The concluding stage of the war in the West lasted from 21 March until 11 November 1918. This saw Germany one time more effort to accomplish triumph with a knock-out blow and one time more fail. The German onslaughts used sophisticated new heavy weapon and foot tactics. They enjoyed dramatic success. The British fifth Army on the Somme suffered a major licking. But the British line held in forepart of Amiens and subsequently to the North in forepart of Ypres. No existent strategic harm was done. By midsummer the German onslaughts had petered out. The German violative broke the trench dead end and returned motion and manœuvre to the strategic docket. It besides compelled closer Allied military co-operation under a Gallic commander in chief, General Ferdinand Foch. The Allied counter-offensive began in July. At the Battle of Amiens, on 8 August, the British struck the German ground forces a terrible blow. For the remainder of the war in the West the Germans were in retreat.

The war in the E was shaped by German strength, Austrian failing, and Russian finding. German military high quality was evident from the start of the war. The Russians suffered two oppressing lickings in 1914, at Tannenberg ( 26-31 August ) and the Masurian Lakes ( 5-15 September ) . These triumphs ensured the security of Germany 's eastern frontiers for the remainder of the war. They besides established the military fable of Field-Marshal Paul von Hindenburg and General Erich Ludendorff, who emerged as chief managers of the German war attempt in the fall of 1916. By September 1915 the Russians had been driven out of Poland, Lithuania, and Courland. Austro-German ground forcess occupied Warsaw and the Russian frontier fortresses of Ivangorod, Kovno, Novo-Georgievsk, and Brest-Litovsk.

These lickings proved dearly-won to Russia. They besides proved dearly-won to Austria. Austria had a black war. Italian entry into the war compelled the Austrians to contend an three foreparts: against Serbia in the Balkans ; against Russia in Galicia ; against Italy in the Trentino. This proved excessively much for Austrian strength. Their war attempt was characterized by dependence on Germany. Germans complained that they were shackled to the 'Austrian cadaver ' . The war exacerbated the Austro-Hungarian Empire 's many cultural and national tensenesss. By 1918 Austria was weary of the war and desperate for peace. This had a major influence on the German determination to seek a triumph in the West in the spring of 1918.

Percepts of the Russian war attempt have been overshadowed by the October Revolution of 1917 and by Bolshevik 'revolutionary defeatism ' which acquiesced in the punitory Treaty of Brest-Litovsk ( 14 March 1918 ) and took Russia out of the war. This has obscured the amazing Russian finding to maintain religion with the Franco-British confederation. Without the Russian part in the E it is far from certain that Germany could hold been defeated in the West. The resolute Russian willingness to help their western Alliess is nowhere more evident than in the 'Brusilov Offensive ' ( June-September 1916 ) , which resulted in the gaining control of the Bukovina and big parts of Galicia, every bit good as 350,000 Austrian captives, but at a cost to Russia which finally proved mortal.

In southern Europe the Italian ground forces fought eleven indecisive conflicts in an effort to free the Austrians from their mountain fastnesss beyond the Isonzo river. In October 1917 Austrian support by seven German divisions resulted in a major Italian licking at Caporetto. The Italians were pushed back beyond the Piave. This licking produced alterations in the Italian high bid. During 1918 Italy discovered a new integrity of intent and a greater grade of organisation. On 24 October 1918 Italian and British forces recrossed the Piave and split the Austrian ground forcess in two at Vittorio Veneto. Austrian retreat turned into mob and so into resignation.

In the Balkans the Serbs fought the Austrians and Bulgarians, enduring monolithic casualties, including the highest proportion of military mans killed of any aggressive power. In October 1915 a Franco-British ground forces was sent to Macedonia to run against the Bulgarians. It struggled to hold any influence on the war. The Germans mocked it and declared Salonika to be the biggest internment cantonment in Europe, but the Gallic and British finally broke out of the malarial fields into the cragged vales of the Vardar and Struma rivers before bring downing licking on Bulgaria in the fall of 1918.

In the Middle East British ground forcess fought the Turks in a major struggle with far-reaching effects. Here the war was characterized by the perseverance of Turkish opposition and by the changeless battle against clime, terrain, and disease. The British attempted to strike hard Turkey out of the war with an onslaught on the Gallipoli peninsula in April 1915, but were compelled to retreat at the terminal of the twelvemonth, holding failed to interrupt out from their narrow beach-heads in the face of obstinate Turkish opposition, coordinated by a German general, Liman von Sanders. The British besides suffered another mortifying contrary in Mesopotamia when a little ground forces commanded by Major-General C. V. F. Townshend advanced to Ctesiphon but outran its supplies and was compelled to give up at Kut-al-Amara in April 1916. Merely after the assignment of Sir Stanley Maude to the bid of British forces in Mesopotamia did Britain 's superior military and economic strength Begin to asseverate itself. Maude 's forces captured Baghdad in March 1917, the first distinct British triumph of the war. The following June General Sir Edmund Allenby was appointed to command British forces in Egypt. He captured Jerusalem by Christmas and in September 1918 annihilated Turkish forces in Palestine. Turkey surrendered on 31 October 1918.

On and under the oceans of the world, Great Britain and Germany contested naval domination. Surface battles took topographic point in the Pacific, the south Atlantic, and the North Sea. The British by and large had the better of these despite enduring some letdowns, notably at Coronel ( 1 November 1914 ) and Jutland ( 31 May-1 June 1916 ) , the lone major fleet battle, during which Admiral Sir John Jellicoe failed to present the expected Nelsonic triumph of entire obliteration. Submarine warfare took topographic point in the North Sea, the Black Sea, the Atlantic, the Mediterranean, and the Baltic. German resort to unrestricted pigboat warfare ( February 1917 ) brought Britain to the brink of ruin. German misdemeanor of international jurisprudence and sinking of American ships besides helped convey the United States into the war on the Allied side. The British naval encirclement of Germany, massively reinforced by the Americans from April 1917, played an of import function in German licking.

The geographical graduated table of the struggle made it really hard for political and military leaders to command events. The duties of alliance inhibited strategic independency. Short-run military demands frequently forced the great powers to let lesser provinces a grade of license they would non hold enjoyed in peacetime. Governments ' deliberate rousing of popular passions made suggestions of via media seem faithless. The ever-rising cost of the military agencies inflated the political terminals. Hopes of a peaceable new world order began to replace old diplomatic abstractions such as 'the balance of power ' . Rationality went out of season. War purposes were obscured. Schemes were distorted. Great Britain entered the war on announced rules of international jurisprudence and in defense mechanism of the rights of little states. By 1918 the British authorities was prosecuting a In-between Eastern policy of bare imperialism ( in coaction with the Gallic ) , while at the same time promoting the aspirations of Arab patriotism and promising support for the constitution of a Judaic national place in Palestine. It was genuinely a war of semblances.

The war which gave the prevarication to these premises was the American Civil War. This had been studied by European military perceivers at close quarters. Most, nevertheless, dismissed it. This was peculiarly true of the Prussians. Their ain military experience in the wars against Austria ( 1866 ) and France ( 1870-1 ) seemed more relevant and compelling. These wars were both short. They were besides instrumental. In 1914 the Germans sought to retroflex the success of their Prussian predecessors. They aimed to contend a 'cabinet war ' on the Bismarckian theoretical account. To make so they developed a program of breath-taking foolhardiness which depended on the ability of the German ground forces to get the better of France in the 39 yearss allowed for a war in the West.

Strategic behavior of the First World War was dominated by German efforts to accomplish triumph through knock-out blows. Erich von Falkenhayn, German commander-in-chief from September 1914 until August 1916, was about entirely in his belief that Germany could obtain an result to the war satisfactory to its involvements and those of its Alliess without winning nailing triumphs of entire obliteration. His bloody effort to win the war by abrasion at Verdun in 1916 did small to urge the scheme to his fellow countrymen. The penchant for knock-out blows remained. It was inherited from German history and was cardinal to Germany 's pre-war planning.

Pre-war German scheme was haunted by the fright of a war on two foreparts, against France in the West and Russia in the E. The possibility of a diplomatic solution to this quandary was hardly considered by the military-dominated German authorities. A military solution was sought alternatively. The German high bid decided that the best signifier of defense mechanism was attack. They would avoid a war on two foreparts by strike harding out one of their enemies before the other could take the field. The enemy with the slowest military mobilisation was Russia. The Gallic ground forces would be in the field foremost. France was hence chosen to have the first blow. Once France was defeated the German ground forcess would turn east and licking Russia.

The failure of the Schlieffen Plan gave the First World War its indispensable form. This was maintained by the digesting power of the German ground forces, which was, in John Terraine 's phrase, 'the motor of the war ' . The German ground forces was a powerful instrument. It had played a historic function in the outgrowth of the German province. It enjoyed tremendous prestigiousness. It was able to enroll work forces of endowment and dedication as officers and NCOs. As a consequence it was good trained and good led. It had the political power to command the resources of Germany 's powerful industrial economic system. Germany 's place at the bosom of Europe meant that it could run on interior lines of communicating in a European war. The efficient German railroad web permitted the motion of German military personnels rapidly from forepart to look. The superior velocity of the engine over the ship frustrated Allied efforts to utilize their bid of the sea to run efficaciously against the fringe of the Central Powers. The power of the German ground forces was the cardinal strategic world of the war. 'We can non trust to win this war until we have defeated the German ground forces, ' wrote the commander-in-chief of the British Expeditionary Force, Field Marshal Sir Douglas Haig. This was a opinion whose effects some Allied political leaders were loath to encompass.

The German ground forces suffered from two of import strategic troubles. The first of these was the inability of the German political system to hammer appropriate instruments of strategic control. The 2nd was Great Britain. German authorities rested on the anguished personality of the Kaiser. It was riven by machination and indecisiveness. The sort of centralised decision-making constructions which finally evolved in Britain and France ( though non in Russia ) failed to germinate in Germany. When the Kaiser proved incapable of organizing German scheme, he was replaced non by a system but by other persons, apparently more effectual. Field Marshal Paul von Hindenburg radiated composure and inspired assurance. This gave him the visual aspect of a great adult male but without the substance. General Erich Ludendorff was a military technocrat of outstanding endowment, but he was extremely strung and without political opinion. In 1918 his violative scheme brought Germany to destroy.

Germany 's pre-war strategic planning was based wholly on winning a short war. British belligerence made this improbable. The British were a naval instead than a military power. They could non be defeated by the German ground forces, at least non rapidly. The British could, if necessary, hold out even after their Continental Alliess had been defeated. They might even hold chosen to make this. They had in the yesteryear and they would once more in the not-too-distant hereafter. The German naval forces was excessively weak to get the better of the British, but big plenty to do them resentful and leery of German policy ; it ought ne'er to hold been built. British entry into the war dramatically shifted the economic balance in favor of the Allies. Britain was one of the world 's great industrial powers. Seventy-five per cent of the world 's transportation was British built and much of it British owned. London was the world 's greatest money and trade goods market. British entree to world supplies of nutrient and recognition and to imperial resources of work force made them a formidable enemy, despite the 'contemptible small ground forces ' which was all they could set into the field on the eruption of war. From about mid-1916 onwards British economic, industrial, and manpower resources began to be to the full mobilized. Germany was forced for the first clip to face the world of material lower status. Germany had progressively to contend a war of scarceness, the Allies progressively a war of copiousness.

Gallic scheme was dominated by the German business of much of northern France and most of Belgium. At its closest point the German line was less than 40 stat mis from Paris. A cautious, defensive scheme was politically unacceptable and psychologically impossible, at least during the first three old ages of the war. During 1914 and 1915 France sacrificed tremendous Numberss of work forces in the effort to evict the Germans. This was followed by the torture of Verdun, where the Germans intentionally attempted to 'bleed France white ' . Gallic frights of military lower status were confirmed. If France was to predominate its Alliess would hold to lend in sort. For the British this was a extremist going from the historic norm and one which has appalled them of all time since.

British scheme became progressively subordinated to the demands of the Franco-British confederation. The British fought the war as they had to, non as they wanted to. The British manner in warfare envisaged a mostly naval war. A naval encirclement would weaken Germany economically. If the German naval forces chose non to interrupt the stranglehold Germany would lose the war. If it did take to contend it would be annihilated. British maritime high quality would be confirmed. Impersonal sentiment would be cowed. Fresh Alliess would be encouraged into the battle. The encirclement would be waged with greater pitilessness. Military operations would be confined to the despatch of a little professional expeditionary force to assist the Gallic. Staying military forces would be employed on the fringe of the Central Powers remote from the German ground forces, where it was believed they would exert a strategic influence out of all proportion to their size.

Kitchener was appointed Secretary of State for War on 5 August 1914. He doubted whether the Gallic and the Russians were strong plenty to get the better of Germany without monolithic British military support. He instantly sought to raise a mass citizen ground forces. There was an overpowering popular response to his call to weaponries. Kitchener envisaged this new British ground forces taking the field in 1917 after the Gallic and Russian ground forcess had rendered the German ground forces ripe for licking. They would be 'the last million work forces ' . They would win the war and make up one's mind the peace. For the British a satisfactory peace would be one which guaranteed the long-run security of the British Empire. This security was threatened as much by Britain 's Alliess, France and Russia, as it was by Germany. It was imperative non merely that the Allies win the war but besides that Britain emerge from it as the dominant power.

Kitchener 's outlooks were disappointed. By 1916 it was the Gallic ground forces which was ripe for licking, non the German. But the duties of the Gallic confederation were ineluctable. The British could non afford to assent in a Gallic licking. Gallic animus and bitterness would replace the valuable common apprehension which had been achieved in the decennary before the war. The Gallic had a great capacity for doing imperial mischievousness. And so did the Russians. If they were abandoned they would hold every ground for making so. There seemed no pick. The ill-trained and ill-equipped British ground forcess would hold to take the field before they were ready and be forced to take a full portion in the abrasion of German military power.

The casualties which this scheme of 'offensive abrasion ' involved were unprecedented in British history. They were besides unacceptable to some British political leaders. Winston Churchill and David Lloyd George ( Prime Minister from December 1916 ) , in peculiar, were opposed to the British ground forces 'chewing barbed wire ' on the Western Front. They looked to utilize it elsewhere, against Germany 's Alliess in the eastern Mediterranean, the Middle East, and the Balkans. Their efforts to make this were inhibited by the demand to maintain France in the war. This could merely be done in France and by contending the German ground forces. They were besides inhibited by the war 's operational and tactical worlds. These imposed themselves on Gallipoli and in Salonika and in Italy merely as they did on the Western Front.

Attempts to implement an Allied expansive scheme enjoyed some success. Allied political and military leaders met on a regular basis. At Chantilly in December 1915 and December 1916 they determined to stretch the German ground forces to its bounds by coincident violative action on the western, eastern, and Italian foreparts. A Supreme Allied War Council was established at Versailles on 27 November 1917, and was given the power to command Allied militias. Franco-British co-operation was particularly near. This was mostly a affair of practical necessity which relied on the common regard and apprehension between Gallic and British commanders-in-chief on the Western Front. The system worked good until the German Spring Offensive of 1918 threatened to split the Allies. Merely so was it replaced by a more formal construction. But non even this attained the degrees of joint planning and control which became a characteristic of Anglo-American co-operation in the Second World War.

The battlegrounds of the First World War were the merchandise of a century of economic, societal, and political alteration. Europe in 1914 was more thickly settled, more affluent, and more coherently organized than of all time before. The rise of patriotism gave provinces unprecedented legitimacy and authorization. This allowed them to demand greater forfeits from their civilian populations. Improvements in agribusiness reduced the Numberss needed to work on the land and provided a excess of males of military age. They besides allowed larger and larger ground forcess to be fed and kept in the field for old ages at a clip. Changes in administrative pattern brought approximately by the electric telegraph, the telephone, the typewriter, and the growing of railroads allowed these ground forcess to be assembled and deployed rapidly. Industrial engineering provided new weapons of unprecedented destructiveness. Quick-firing rifled cannon, breech-loading magazine rifles, and machine-guns transformed the scope, celerity, truth, and lethality of military firepower. They besides ensured that in any future war, scientists, applied scientists, and mechanics would be every bit of import as soldiers.

These alterations did much to do the First World War the first 'modern war ' . But it did non get down as one. The fact of a firepower revolution was understood in most European ground forcess. The effects of it were non. The experience of the Russo-Japanese War ( 1904-5 ) appeared to offer a human solution to the jobs of the technological battleground. Victory would travel to the side with the best-trained, most disciplined ground forces, commanded by generals of Fe declaration, prepared to keep the violative in the face of immense losingss. As a consequence the gap conflicts of the war were closer in construct and executing to those of the Napoleonic epoch than to the conflicts of 1916 onwards.

For much of the war heavy weapon lacked the ability to happen enemy marks, to hit them accurately, and to destruct them efficaciously. Contemporary engineering failed to supply a man-portable radio. Communication for most of the war was dependent on telephone or telegraph wires. These were ever broken by shell-fire and hard to protect. Artillery and foot commanding officers were seldom in voice communicating and both normally lacked 'real clip ' intelligence of battlefield events ; First World War foot commanding officers could non easy name down heavy weapon fire when confronted by an enemy obstructor. As a consequence the coordination of foot and heavy weapon was really hard and frequently impossible. Infantry commanding officers were forced to fall back on their ain firepower and this was frequently unequal. The foot normally found itself with excessively much to make, and paid a high monetary value for its failing.

Artillery was non merely a major portion of the job, nevertheless. It was besides a major portion of the solution. During 1918 Allied heavy weapon on the western forepart emerged as a formidable arm. Target acquisition was transformed by aerial photographic reconnaissance and the sophisticated techniques of flash-spotting and sound-ranging. These allowed mathematically predicted fire, or map-shooting. The pre-registration of guns on enemy marks by existent fire was no longer necessary. The possibility of surprise returned to the battleground. Accuracy was greatly improved by keeping runing histories for single guns. Battery commanding officers were supplied with elaborate conditions prognosiss every four hours. Each gun could now be separately calibrated harmonizing to its ain distinctive features and harmonizing to weave velocity and way, temperature, and humidness. All types and qualities of guns, including heavy besieging mortars whose steep angle of fire was particularly effectual in trench warfare, became available in virtually limitless Numberss. Weaponries were besides improved. Poison gas shells became available for the first clip in big Numberss. High explosive replaced shrapnel, a lay waste toing anti-personnel arm but mostly uneffective against the earthworks, barbed wire webs, and concrete machine-gun emplacements which the foot had to assail. Instantaneous percussion fuses concentrated the explosive consequence of shells more efficaciously against barbed wire and reduced the cratering of the battleground which had frequently rendered the forward motion of supplies and supports hard if non impossible. Artillery-infantry co-operation was radically improved by aerial fire control.

The tactical utilizations to which this destructive instrument were put besides changed. In 1915, 1916, and for much of 1917 heavy weapon was used chiefly to kill enemy soldiers. It ever did so, sometimes in big Numberss. But it ever spared some, even in front-line trenches. These were frequently plenty, as during the first twenty-four hours of the Battle of the Somme ( 1 July 1916 ) , to bring down black casualties on assailing foot and convey an full offense to a arrest. From the fall of 1917 and during 1918, nevertheless, heavy weapon was chiefly used to stamp down enemy defense mechanisms. Command stations, telephone exchanges, hamlets, supply mopess, forming-up countries, and gun batteries were targeted. Effective usage was made of toxicant gas, both deadly and lacrimatory, and fume. The purpose was to interrupt the enemy 's bid and control system and maintain his soldiers ' caputs down until assailing foot could shut with them and convey their ain firepower to bear.

From the fall of 1916 the Germans took these alterations to their logical decision by establishing a system of 'elastic defense mechanism in deepness ' . The German forepart line was sited where possible on a contrary incline to do enemy heavy weapon observation hard. A formal front-line trench system was abandoned. The German first line consisted of machine-gunners located in shell-holes, hard to observe from the air. Their occupation was to interrupt an enemy foot assault. This would so be drawn deep into the German place, beyond the back uping fire of its ain guns, where it would be counter-attacked and destroyed by the majority of the German foot and heavy weapon. This system allowed the Germans to last against an Allied work force high quality of more than 3:2 on the Western Front throughout 1917 and to bring down important losingss on their enemies.

The German system required intelligent and well-trained every bit good as brave soldiers to do it work. An increasing accent was placed on single enterprise, surprise, and velocity. In 1918 specially trained ‘stormtroops ' , supported by a hurricane barrage designed to interrupt their enemies ' lines of communicating and their bid and control systems, were ordered to short-circuit points of opposition and progress deep into the enemy 's rear. The success they enjoyed was dramatic, and much greater than anything achieved by the Gallic and British, but it was non plenty. Assaultive German foot could non keep the impulse and inflict upon enemy commanders the sort of moral palsy achieved by German armored forces in 1940. The Allied line held and dog-tired German foot were finally forced back by the roll uping weight and increasing edification of Allied stuff engineering.

The material solution to the jobs of the First World War battleground, favoured by the western Allies, was non in the gift of soldiers entirely. It depended on the ability of the armes ' host societies to bring forth improved military engineering in ever-greater sums. This, in bend, depended on the effectivity of their political establishments and the quality of their civilian morale. It was a competition at which the broad democracies of France and Great Britain ( and finally the United States of America ) proved more expert than the autocratic governments of Austria-Hungary, Germany, and Russia.

The 'modern war ' fought from 1916 onwards resolved itself merely into a demand for more: more work forces, more weapons, more ammo, more money, more accomplishments, more morale, more nutrient. Some of the demands were contradictory. More work forces meant more work forces for the ground forcess and more work forces for the mills. Balancing the viing demands was ne'er easy. 'Manpower ' ( a word foremost coined in 1915 ) became cardinal to the war attempt of all provinces. The Allies were in a much stronger place than Germany. They had entree non merely to their place populations but besides to those of their imperiums. 630,000 Canadians, 412,000 Australians, 136,000 South Africans, and 130,000 New Zealanders served in the British ground forces during the war. Very big Numberss of Indian military personnels ( 800,000 in Mesopotamia entirely ) and a little figure of Africans ( possibly 50,000 ) besides served. ( The British besides employed several hundred thousand Chinese laborers to work on their lines of communicating. ) The Gallic recruited some 600,000 combat military personnels from North and West Africa and a farther 200,000 laborers. And of class there were the Americans. American military personnels arrived in France at the rate of 150,000 a month in 1918. Truly the new world had come in to right the balance of the old.

The British and Gallic were peculiarly successful in mobilising their economic systems. In Britain this had much to make with the work of David Lloyd George as Minister of Munitions ( May 1915-July 1916 ) . The clasp of the skilled trade brotherhoods on industrial procedures was relaxed. Ancient lines of limit were blurred. Womans replaced work forces in the mills. Research and development were given a proper topographic point in industrial scheme. Prodigies of production were achieved. On 10 March 1915, at the Battle of Neuve Chapelle, the British Expeditionary Force struggled to roll up adequate shells for half an hr 's barrage. In the fall of 1918 its 18-pounder field guns were firing a lower limit of 100,000 unit of ammunitions a twenty-four hours.

Morale was besides a cardinal factor. All sides tried to explicate and warrant the war and used progressively refined techniques of propaganda to keep committedness to the cause. Giving the feeling of hardship shared every bit among the categories became a cardinal subject. One of the major menaces to this was the equality of entree to nutrient supplies. In Germany this proved progressively hard to keep. Morale deteriorated and industrial efficiency suffered as a consequence. British agribusiness did non execute peculiarly good during the war, but British maritime high quality and fiscal power allowed them to command the agricultural resources of North and South America and Australasia. Food was one of the Allies’ chief war-winning weapons. The grade of active opposition to the war was low in most states. But war-weariness set in everyplace by 1917. There were many work stoppages and much industrial agitation. In Russia this was terrible plenty to bring forth a revolution and so a Bolshevik putsch d’état which took Russia out of the war in 1918.

The First World War redrew the map of Europe and the Middle East. Four great imperiums, the Romanov, the Hohenzollern, the Habsburg, and the Ottoman, were defeated and collapsed. They were replaced by a figure of weak and sometimes covetous replacement provinces. Russia underwent a bloody civil war before the constitution of a Communist Soviet Union which put it beyond the picket of European diplomatic negotiations for a coevals. Germany became a democracy branded at its birth with the stigma of licking, progressively weakened by the load of Allied reparations and by rising prices. France recovered the states of Alsace and Lorraine, but continued to be haunted by fright and abhorrence of Germany. Italy was disappointed by the territorial wagess of its military forfeit. This provided fertile dirt for Mussolini 's Fascists, who had overthrown parliamentary democracy by 1924. The British maintained the unity and independency of Belgium. They besides acquired immense additions in imperial district and imperial duty. But they did non accomplish the security for the Empire which they sought. The white rules were unimpressed by the quality of British military leading. The First World War saw them maturate as independent states seeking progressively to travel their ain manner. The stirrings of rebellion in India were evident every bit shortly as the war ended. In 1922 the British were forced, under American force per unit area, to abandon the Anglo-Japanese confederation, so utile to them in protecting their Far Eastern imperium. They were besides forced to accept naval para with the Americans and a au naturel high quality over the Nipponese. 'This is non a peace, ' Marshal Foch declared in 1919, 'but an cease-fire for 25 old ages. '

New arms and intercessions can finally make up one's mind who will win a war. In World War I there were many new weapons introduced into the conflict scene. These new weapons were more efficient in destructing and more powerful which made the decease count rise dramatically. The new arms in World War I helped lend to it being one of the bloodiest wars know to adult male at that clip. One key arm that played a portion in finally conveying the United provinces into the war was the pigboat, besides called U-boats. This pigboat was able to travel submerged and attack ships without being spotted. A major job with these ships that it broke international jurisprudence. For the ground that when the Germans would assail a impersonal ship they would non warn the ship like they were supposed to. If the Germans had warned there enemies they would easy be destroyed because the ships were so delicate and slow moving. The Submarine was used as a tool to coerce trade stoppage. The other states did non desire to put on the line going the high seas with the pigboats out at that place ready to strike, so trade was put to a halt in certain countries. While the U-boat enforced trade stoppage was turn outing to be an effectual arm, it besides seemed that it would convey America into the war against Germany ( Bowes 595 ) . Some weapons had even been around for a while, but were non used efficaciously in large-scale combat. For illustration, the machine gun, in the signifier of the Gatling Gun or Maxim Gun, was really invented during the American Civil War, but did non see widespread usage until World War I. Chemical weapons were used on a monolithic graduated table in World War I. Mustard gas and Cl gas were two of the more often used weapons. Chlorine is an smothering gas that causes acute bronchitis with gradual asphyxiation and, `` those who ab initio survived a considerable dosage by and large died from pneumonia. '' The effects were so atrocious that they have been largely controlled since so. Mustard gas green goodss.

Thru 1914 and 1919 World War One was the largest and most of import current event occurrence and during the war engineering increased enormously, but most of the inventions were directed towards weapons and harmful objects of war, such as ; rifles and handguns, machine gas, and grenades these three objects of war were illustrations of engineering that changed for the clip or were invented. These three things will be discussed and analyzed throughout my paper and proven to be powerful and meaningful in this war. Rifles and handguns like in every other war they were in being were a big and important portion of this one excessively. They were more accurate and powerful therefore leting the work forces to hit a mark from farther off with a better opportunity of hitting where they aimed. Almost all foot and officers in World War One carried a rifle, handgun or both. They were the most common arm. About all marchers in the First World War used bolt action rifles. This type of rifle had been invented by a Scots immigrant to the United States, James Paris Lee. The bolt is the device that closes the rear of barrel of the barrel. The bolt-action rifle had a metal box, which cartridges were placed on top of a spring. As the bolt was opened, the spring forced the cartridges up against a halt ; the bolt pushed the top cartridge into the chamber as it closed. After firing, the gap of the bolt extracted the empty cartridge instance, and the return shot loaded a fresh unit of ammunition. The more popular of the rifles used by each state is listed as follows. The Lee-Enfield was the chief rifle used by the British Army during the war. Other popular bolt action rifles included the Mauser Gewehr ( Germany ) , Lebel ( France ) , Mannlicher-Carcano ( Italy ) , Springfield ( United States ) , Moisin-Nagant ( Russia ) , Mannlicher M95 ( Austria ) and Arisaka ( Japan ) . Although handguns were common for all foot and officers non all work forces carried them they were non as accurate or powerful yet had some importance.

The Weapons of World War 1

The chief arm used by the American armed forces at the clip would be the Springfield 1903 bolt action rifle, like the Mauser it had a 5 unit of ammunition internal magazine, nevertheless the Springfield used a 30-06 unit of ammunition non a 8mm unit of ammunition, now this meant that the 1903 had less knockdown power ( non plenty to do it where it was non efficient ) but made it less boring for the taw. The chief ground that the 1903 was more efficient was that it was easier on the soldier than the Kar was. The Springfield like the Kar was used in the second world war, but the Americans issued the M1 Garand to more of its soldiers than it did the 1903.

Weapons of World War 1

The chief arm used by the American armed forces at the clip would be the Springfield 1903 bolt action rifle, like the Mauser it had a 5 unit of ammunition internal magazine, nevertheless the Springfield used a 30-06 unit of ammunition non a 8mm unit of ammunition, now this meant that the 1903 had less knockdown power ( non plenty to do it where it was non efficient ) but made it less boring for the taw. The chief ground that the 1903 was more efficient was that it was easier on the soldier than the Kar was. The Springfield like the Kar was used in the second world war, but the Americans issued the M1 Garand to more of its soldiers than it did the 1903.

Swerving Subjects

Imagine a war so great and powerful that new weapons and thoughts were created in order to contend it. This is precisely what took topographic point during World War 1. Both sides of the war invented different types of arms and heavy weapon. These weapons that were invented were ne'er introduced to society before the war. The work forces traveling to war had no thought what the other side was traveling to utilize or non to utilize. The new weapons were machine guns, howitzers, toxicant gases, armored combat vehicles, aeroplanes, and submarines. During the Great War there were several effects of these new weapons. These effects were additions in casualties, trench warfare, and monolithic land devastations. The most of import new arm of the war was the machine gun. The machine guns were the chief grounds why trenches were built. The machine guns fired 100s of times in one minute. Machine guns entirely could pass over a thousand work forces. Another new arm was the trench howitzers. Trench howitzers were simple weapons that fired heavy bombs at high angles, coming down on the enemy trenches. Another, more agonizing new arm was the toxicant gas. It was foremost used by Germany 1915. These toxicant gases were either released from case shots that the air current penetrated into the trenches of the enemy, or they were fired into trenches in shells. A severely gassed soldier suffered through a long an agonising decease. The tegument burned off in immense blisters, while his lungs and pharynx rotted. The hapless work forces eventually died form asphyxiation or he drowned in his ain lungs, which were filled with fluids. Other new machines were armored combat vehicles, aeroplanes, and submarines. Tanks were heavy pieces of movable vehicles that destroyed anything or anyone in their waies. The British invented the armored combat vehicle and the aeroplane. Airplanes held a. pilot, a artilleryman, and carried bombs so it could bomb the enemies. Submarines were under H2O boats that were largely used for suicide missions. The suicide missions were when soldiers attacked their marks cognizing that they were traveling to decease.

9. Information Warfare as Weapons of Mass Destruction

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Information Warfare as a Weapon of Mass Destruction has in recent old ages commanded a batch of attending from authoritiess, sections of defence, and private corporations around the world.. It besides discusses the policy issue of whether or non the United States should uncover its IW capablenesss to the remainder of the world.. The atomic reserves, across the Earth, grew enormously in the cold war epoch of the 1980s.. Biological and Chemical weapons have been used in war to heighten military capableness and their usage has become more prevalent.. The Gulf War where some Al.


The British entered the war with the pole-handled impact exploding `` Grenade, Hand No 1 '' . The No. 15 `` Ball Grenade '' partly overcame its insufficiencies. British forces nevertheless chiefly used an jury-rigged manus explosive that was at times more hard to utilize, yet still utile in conflict. This was the Double Cylinder `` jam Sn '' which consisted of a Sn filled with dynamite or cellulose nitrate, packed unit of ammunition with scrap metal or rocks. To light, at the top of the Sn there was a Bickford safety fuse linking the detonating device, which was lit by either a cigar, or a 2nd individual. The `` Mills bomb '' ( Grenade, Hand No. 5 '' ) was invented during the war and came into usage in 1915. Its improved fusing system killed more of the enemy and fewer of its users. The Gallic interim introduced the F1 defensive grenade.


In the nineteenth century, Britain and France exploited the rapid proficient developments in heavy weapon to function a War of Movement. Such weapons served good in the colonial wars of that century, and served Germany really good in the Franco-Prussian War, but trench warfare was more like a besieging, and called for besieging guns. The German ground forces had already anticipated that a European war might necessitate heavier heavy weapon, hence had a more appropriate mix of sizes. Foundries responded to the existent state of affairs with more heavy merchandises and fewer extremely nomadic pieces. Germany developed the Paris guns of colossal size and scope. However, the needfully colossal muzzle speed wore out a gun barrel after a few shootings necessitating a return to the mill for relining, so these weapons served more to scare and anger urban people than to kill them or lay waste to their metropoliss.

Field heavy weapon entered the war with the thought that each gun should be accompanied by 100s of shells, and armouries ought to hold about a 1000 on manus for resupply. This proved utterly inadequate when it became platitude for a gun to sit in one topographic point and fire a 100 shells or more per twenty-four hours for hebdomads or months on terminal. To run into the ensuing Shell Crisis of 1915, mills were hurriedly converted from other intents to do more ammo. Railwaies to the forepart were expanded or built, go forthing the inquiry of the last stat mi. Horses in World War I were the chief reply, and their high decease rate earnestly weakened the Central Powers tardily in the war. In many topographic points the freshly invented trench railroads helped. The new motor trucks as yet lacked pneumatic tyres, various suspension, and other betterments that in ulterior decennaries would let them to execute good.

At sea

Submarines and their armament had likewise improved, but few were in service. Germany had already increased production, and rapidly built up its U-boat fleet, both for action against British war vessels and for a counterblockade of the British Isles. 360 were finally built. The ensuing U-boat Campaign ( World War I ) destroyed more enemy war vessels than the High Seas Fleet had, and hampered British war supplies as the more expensive surface fleet had non. However, the pigboats shortly came under persecution by pigboat pursuers and other little war vessels utilizing hurriedly devised anti-submarine weapons. They could non enforce an effectual encirclement while moving under the limitations of the award regulations and international jurisprudence of the sea. They resorted to unrestricted pigboat warfare, which cost Germany public understanding in impersonal states and was a factor lending to the American entry into World War I.

Trench warfare

Old weapons were revived or re-invented to pay trench warfare efficaciously. Mortars, which offered frontline troops a portable agencies of lobbing high explosive bombs into enemy trenches, began to proliferate. Hand grenades offered similar firepower on a smaller graduated table to single soldiers. To the horror of many commanding officers, the grenade threatened to replace the rifle as the infantryman’s head arm. Finally, the most crude weapons of all, nines and knives, were used in the ghastly concern of manus to manus combat during trench foraies, or when ‘cleaning’ – to utilize the Gallic Army’s euphemism – a captured place of enemy subsisters.


By 1917 assailing military personnels supported by sufficient heavy weapon could about vouch to interrupt into enemy defense mechanisms. The enemy’s guns would be neutralised every bit far as possible by ‘counter-battery’ fire and its foot pinned down by heavy weapon and machine gun bombardments. The foot would progress behind a ‘creeping barrage’ that forced the guardians to maintain their caputs down. Smoke shells might be used to cover the progress. New instantaneous fuses allowed high-explosive shells to cut waies through barbed-wire webs. Ground-attack airplanes might be pouncing overhead. Any counter-attack would be met with ‘SOS’ bombardments of heavy weapon and machine gun fire.

Of class the foot still needed to contend its manner frontward, and it excessively was aided by new weapons. In 1914 the marcher had relied about wholly upon his rifle and bayonet. By 1917 an foot platoon would include specialist subdivisions of ‘bombers’ ( armed with manus grenades ) , rifle-grenadiers, and light machine artillerymans or automatic riflemen. The latter would trap the enemy down while the bombers, supported by riflemen, worked themselves into a place from where they could establish the decisive onslaught. These new tactics were made possible by the development of light automatic weapons, which offered little foot units a degree of firepower terra incognita in 1914.


But none of these inventions in arms entirely could present the Holy Grail – a discovery and a return to mobile warfare. When this signifier of warfare re-emerged in 1918 it was as a consequence of polishs in the tactics, which maximised the consequence of the weapons. Artillery no longer sought to blare the enemy from its defense mechanisms, or even needfully to kill his military personnels. Alternatively, short, but intense bombardments, blending high explosive and gas, neutralised the enemy’s ability to defy – cutting his communications, stamp downing his heavy weapon fire and disorientating the work forces. The Germans achieved discoveries in the spring and summer of 1918 by utilizing this kind of bombardment and assailing with highly-trained assault military personnels. But the latter were a finite trade good and the Allies were finally able to counterstrike. They did so with inexorable efficiency. Artillery was still the key, but the Gallic, British and Americans were able to unite its power with big measures of armored combat vehicles ( when serviceable ) and superior Numberss of aircraft ( weather allowing ) .


There was an immediate push-back to make defensive steps against the deadliness of the gas. Attempts to protect the organic structure against inspiration of harmful substances began 70 old ages before the war. Protective, fundamental devices for fire combatants were designed to filtrate fume and gas. In 1915, the British found that C monoxide emanations from undischarged shells were a menace to their military personnels. The German chloride onslaught added to the demand for a rapid declaration. The Germans knew there would be reprisals in sort. They besides would necessitate protection. The earliest caput screens and filter systems on both sides of the trenches were uneffective.

Within a twelvemonth, Battye was mostly replaced by the `` Mills Bomb '' invented by English discoverer William Mills.The Mills grenade, to a great extent grooved, had the visual aspect of a Ananas comosus and was referred to by the name of that fruit. This was a defensive, atomization arm that upon its detonation little, deadly fragments would fleetly be dispersed in the country in which it landed. However, the set downing country was much greater than its German opposite number and exposed the throwster. Thus the throwster would throw and instantly seek screen to avoid the winging atoms. The `` Ananas comosus '' could be thrown accurately about 50 pess, but its killing zone could be 100 paces.

Less than five old ages after a United States reconnaissance balloon flew over a Cuban battleground ( Spanish American war 1898 ) , Orville Wright flew a heavier than air fixed-wing bi-plane over a Kitty Hawk beach in North Carolina. The 1903 flight rose for a 3 2nd flight lifted by the power of an engine. It besides established a criterion for commanding an aircraft. By 1908, they sought a contract with the United States Army ( and with the Germans, and the British ) . No sale! However, in that twelvemonth at that place was a discovery contract with the U.S. Board of Ordnance to construct a plane based on the specifications of the Wright brothers.

This hydroplane had an operating scope of about 400 stat mis, and it could run at approximately 70 MPH. Its flying span was 43 pess and organic structure about 27 pes length. It carried a little bomb burden and was protected by machine guns. This plane was most effectual in convoy responsibility in anti pigboat responsibility, and the first to hit down a German Zeppelin over the North Atlantic. Zeppelin 's were in usage by the Germans in 1914 and used to bomb the Belgium town of Liege. By mid 1918, there were 900 hydroplanes on line, and 400 active over European Waterss. German ally, Austro-Hungarians, built their version of a `` patrol boat '' named Lohner L. ( lower right ) .

In 1914, the quality of the planes was questionable. There were excessively many casualties from structural defects. Yet the combatants recognized the tactical and strategic value of the airplane ( as it was known ) , and endeavor to fabricate a better merchandise. The cloths, cotton, silk, linen, that covered the wings were extremely flammable. Later in the war a pot merchandise was introduced into the cloth which maintained its tension. Until the debut of that development, retrieving the fabric surfaces of the plane was an on-going activity. The wooden organic structures remained the criterion, and metal frames did non come into usage until late in 1918 when introduced in the German Junker J9 combatant. The manoeuvrability of the Junker as a combatant was debatable, but deemed extremely serviceable for their naval forces.

In the early old ages of the war, the biplane was used chiefly for reconnaissance. The plane would vibrate over enemy lines and act as an heavy weapon spotter. It besides reported on troop motion. Air picture taking utilizing glass home bases and Kodak cellulose movie were on a regular basis used. Military historiographers believe that the plane was a hindrance against surprise onslaughts and manoeuvres, and a important subscriber to the trench war deadlock. Later in the war, planes from each side engaged in `` trench strafing '' which created mayhem for the work forces seeking screen. The Gallic Salmson 2A2 was a typical reconnaissance plane that was besides used by the American pilots.The American Expeditionary Force ( AEF ) purchased 705 from the Gallic.

On the western forepart, western air currents would hinder returning Gallic and British planes to their lines doing them to set down in enemy district. Their pilots were captured, and held as captives of war. Additionally, visibleness was limited to about one to two stat mis in descrying a individual aircraft. Furthermore, the heights for observation were low plenty that the planes were exposed to plunder and machine gun land fire. The celebrated German one, Manfred von Richtenhofer, `` the Red Baron '' reportedly was hit from the land and plunged with his Fokker biplane to his decease into Australian lines. Respect for him earned a sedate side `` royal salutation '' held by the Aussies.

The individual ( mono ) wing, Bi and tri wing airplanes ( British discrepancy of aeroplane ) flew with either individual or dual unfastened cockpits. All were in service at the same clip. As the war progressed, speeds up to 100 MPH became the norm. During the war, there were good over one hundred different aircraft in service. Each original theoretical account was, with about no exclusion, updated and revised legion times. The rear, unfastened place, occupied by the perceiver, was armed with a machine gun. The gun could be sighted on a passing enemy plane, but its circle of fire was limited by the presence of the pilot in forepart of the gunner.This left the zone in forepart of the pilot exposed to the enemy perceiver 's arm.

It was apparent to the interior decorators that the arrangement of a machine gun in forepart of the pilot 's eyes, much like a riflemen spying along the rifle barrel, was the appropriate location. At first, the applied scientists mounted the gun on a wing alongside or above the pilot. The place distorted the purpose of the pilot and interfered with the concentration required to run the plane. The challenge was turn uping the gun on the olfactory organ of the plane, in forepart of the pilot, without its missiles striking the revolving propellor. That job was solved by clocking the gun 's sustained explosions with the propellor 's rotary motion -- synchronism. The gun was so emplaced and runing in the way of the traveling plane.

The pilot so became an violative participant in the sky conflict that frequently placed him within paces of the enemy plane. It besides required a high grade of accomplishment to last. Pilot 's learned to utilize their environment with its limited visibleness. They would assail when the Sun was in the enemy 's eyes. Dive, like a missile, at high velocity from cloud screen aimed at the plane below. This latter maneuver and superb maneuvering tactics were perfected by the German one, Max Immelman ( below ) . His plane of pick was the individual wing combatant, Fokker EL, that became his funeral bier in 1916. His name and manoeuvre is synonymous and survives coevalss of pilots.

`` When commanding, I ever drew up my ain orders for the military operation of the contending units, and personally checked the sending and reception by the unit commanding officer of their particular orders. When orders were non obeyed, it was normally the dominating officer who was at mistake. Either the orders had non been delivered or they were so written that cipher could understand them. I ever kept an officer at my central office, whose name I shall non advert, who I had read all the orders. If he could understand them anybody could. He was non peculiarly bright but he was one of the most valuable officers I had '' .

Sea WarAbove and Under

The British began the war in 1914 with a larger pigboat fleet than Germany. Their public-service corporation in the Atlantic was hampered by the quality of their encirclement on German transportation. Targets were few and therefore their demand was diminished. However, one British pigboat had some triumphs in the North Atlantic against smaller German naval vass. However, they did hold some value in the Baltic Sea where the German fleet maintained bases and operated in more safety than in the Atlantic. The British surface fleet, toward the terminal of the war, succeeded in pin downing those bases and forced the Germans to scurry their ships.

The pigboat was by and large 114 pess in length and carried a crew of 35 elect forces. Its general rules were tested in the American civil War and so in the Russo-Japanese war earlier in the twentieth century ( 1904 ) . By 1914, submersing operations were completed by make fulling a armored combat vehicle in the hull with sea H2O which pushed the air in that armored combat vehicle into another flask and so adjusted for perkiness. To come up, the operation was reversed by forcing air from the flask into the armored combat vehicle. Surfacing in less than 24 hours was necessary to refill the air supply. When the pigboat was hunted and air was in short supply, the crew 's activity was limited to decrease their demand for O, and the absolute necessity to come up to refill the air supply.

The U boats operated with diesel burning engines and when submerged they viewed the surface through a periscope. Above all, the hull had to be constructed to defy the force per unit areas of the deep oceans. Their scope was extensive.They hovered off the American E seashore and from a port on the Adriatic seashore, and put Italian transportation in the Mediterranean at hazard. In 1916, the U 35 sunk an Italian ship with a loss of life of 60 crewmans. In another 1916 locale, a U-boat captain anchored his bomber in international H2O off the Newport, Rhode Island seashore. He came on shore, collected supplies, to the surprise of occupants, and returned to his boat where he calmly attacked merchandiser vass.

1915: First Lord of the Admiralty, Winston Churchill, desired to open a 2nd forepart against the Germans. In early March he was determined to prehend the Dardanelles Straits and Constantinople from the German ally, Ottoman Turks. The Turkish fleet was at the clip pelting Russian coastal metropoliss on the Black Sea. Therefore two intents would be served. A 2nd forepart against the Germans to deviate some of their resources from the European Western forepart in France, and to alleviate the Entente 's Russian ally from Turkish force per unit area. In concurrence with Gallic and Australians Churchill commenced the sea run.

The Congress passed the Naval Act of 1916 that promised a larger, more robust naval forces that would outclass the combined tunnage of any two European powers that included 10 battlewagons, six conflict patrol cars, 30 pigboats, and 50 destroyers, and other support vass. The building plan would continue over a three-year period.Two months earlier the world learned of the Jutland fiasco that significantly diminished the importance of the immense battlewagons. With that in head, the Naval Act was amended to cut the figure of battlewagons and sagely put that money into the smaller patrol cars.

The gunman boat served a utile intent against surface ships, but a larger trade was necessary to protect bottoms. The qualities of the gunman boat were incorporated in the destroyer: velocity, manoeuvrability and added size of explosive payload.The American Wickes -class destroyer was 314 long. It carried four 102 millimeter guns, to a great extent armored and had two depth charge racks. It operated at 35 knots. Their presence in the Atlantic convoys reduced the pigboat toll by about 70 % . Not any American troop ship was sunk.Between 1917 and 1919, the United States built 111 Wickes category destroyers.

World War 1 Weapons World War 1 Weapons

American Military History, John W, Chambers. Ed. , Oxford University Press.New York 1999.Complete Encyclopedia of Arms & Weapons, Leonid Tarassuk and Charles Blair.SimonSchuster, NewYork 1999. Department of Air ForceHeyman, Neil M. World War 1, Greenwood Press, Westport, Ct 1997.Imperial War MuseumLibrary of CongressManchester, William. The Weaponries of Krupp. Little, Brown and Company, Boston 1964.National ArchivesReilly, Ralph. Reiley 's @ world net.att. netThe Dictionary of the First World War, Stephen Pope and Elizabeth-Anne Wheal, St. Martin 's Press, New York 1995.The Encyclopedia of World War I, Spencer I. Tucker Ed. ABC-CLIO 2005U.S. Air ServiceWikipediaWorld Almanac, David R. Woodward, Facts on File New York 2009.YouTube

12 Technological Promotions of World War I

Although the Byzantines and Chinese used weapons that hurled flaring stuff in the mediaeval period, the first design for a modern flamethrower was submitted to the German Army by Richard Fiedler in 1901, and the devices were tested by the Germans with an experimental withdrawal in 1911. Their true potency was merely realized during trench warfare, nevertheless. After a massed assault on enemy lines, it wasn’t uncommon for enemy soldiers to hole up in sand traps and dugouts hollowed into the side of the trenches. Unlike grenades, flamethrowers could “neutralize” ( i.e. fire alive ) enemy soldiers in these confined infinites without bring downing structural harm ( the sand traps might come in ready to hand for the new occupants ) . The flamethrower was foremost used by German military personnels near Verdun in February 1915.

Poison gas was used by both sides with lay waste toing consequences ( good, sometimes ) during the Great War. The Germans pioneered the large-scale usage of chemical weapons with a gas onslaught on Russian places on January 31, 1915, during the Battle of Bolimov, but low temperatures froze the toxicant ( xylyl bromide ) in the shells. The first successful usage of chemical weapons occurred on April 22, 1915, close Ypres, when the Germans sprayed Cl gas from big cylinders towards trenches held by Gallic colonial military personnels. The guardians fled, but typically for the First World War, this didn’t output a decisive consequence: the Germans were slow to follow up with foot onslaughts, the gas dissipated, and the Allied defences were restored. Before long, of class, the Allies were utilizing toxicant gas excessively, and over the class of the war both sides resorted to progressively insidious compounds to crush gas masks, another new innovation ; therefore the overall consequence was a immense addition in wretchedness for non much alteration in the strategic state of affairs ( a repeating subject of the war ) .

While the Great War involved a batch of ineffectual activity, contending at dark was particularly unproductive because there was no manner to see where you were hiting. Night combat was made slightly easier by the British innovation of tracer bullets—rounds which emitted little sums of flammable stuff that left a phosphorescent trail. The first effort, in 1915, wasn’t really that utile, as the trail was “erratic” and limited to 100 metres, but the 2nd tracer theoretical account developed in 1916, the.303 SPG Mark VIIG, emitted a regular bright greenish-white trail and was a existent hit ( acquire it? ) . Its popularity was due in portion to an unexpected side-benefit: the flammable agent could light H, which made it hone for “balloon-busting” the German zeppelins so terrorising England.

Airplanes had been around for merely a decennary when WWI started, and while they had obvious potency for combat applications as an aerial platform for bombs and machine guns, it wasn’t rather clear how the latter would work, since the propellor blades got in the manner. In the first effort, the U.S. Army fundamentally tied the gun to the plane ( indicating towards the land ) with a leather strap, and it was operated by a artilleryman who sat beside the pilot. This was non ideal for aerial combat and inconvenient because it required two aviators to run. Another solution was mounting the gun good above the pilot, so the slugs cleared the propellor blades, but this made it difficult to take. After the Swiss applied scientist Franz Schneider patented his thought for an interrupter cogwheel in 1913, a finished version was presented by Dutch interior decorator Anthony Fokker, whose “synchronizer, ” centered on a Cam attached to the propellor shaft, allowed a machine gun to fire between the blades of a whirling propellor. The Germans adopted Fokker’s innovation in May 1915, and the Allies shortly produced their ain versions. Schneider subsequently sued Fokker for patent violation.

In the first yearss of flight, one time a plane left the land the pilot was reasonably much isolated from the tellurian world, unable to have any information aside from obvious signals utilizing flags or lamps. This changed thanks to the attempts of the U.S. Army, which installed the first operational two-way wirelesss in planes during the Great War ( but prior to U.S. engagement ) . Development began in 1915 at San Diego, and by 1916 technicians could direct a wireless telegraph over a distance of 140 stat mis ; wireless telegraph messages were besides exchanged between planes in flight. Finally, in 1917, for the first clip a human voice was transmitted by wireless from a plane in flight to an operator on the land.

The German U-boat run against Allied transporting sank 1000000s of dozenss of lading and killed 10s of 1000s of crewmans and civilians, coercing the Allies to calculate out a manner to battle the pigboat threat. The solution was the depth charge, fundamentally an submerged bomb that could be lobbed from the deck of a ship utilizing a slingshot or chute. Depth charges were set to travel off at a certain deepness by a hydrostatic handgun that measured H2O force per unit area, sing the depth charge wouldn’t harm surface vass, including the launch ship. After the thought was sketched out in 1913, the first practical deepness charge, the Type D, was produced by the Royal Navy’s Torpedo and Mine School in January 1916. The first German U-boat sunk by depth charge was the U-68, destroyed on March 22, 1916.

Of class it was a large aid if you could really turn up the U-boat utilizing sound moving ridges, which required a mike that could work underwater, or hydrophone. The first hydrophone was invented by 1914 by Reginald Fessenden, a Canadian discoverer who really started working on the thought as a manner to turn up icebergs following the Titanic catastrophe ; nevertheless, it was of limited usage because it couldn’t state the way of an submerged object, merely the distance. The hydrophone was farther improved by the Frenchman Paul Langevin and Russian Constantin Chilowsky, who invented an ultrasound transducer trusting on piezoelectric effect, or the electric charge held in certain minerals: a thin bed of quartz held between two metal home bases responded to bantam alterations in H2O force per unit area ensuing from sound moving ridges, leting the user to find both the distance and way of an submerged object. The hydrophone claimed its first U-boat victim in April 1916. A ulterior version perfected by the Americans could observe U-boats up to 25 stat mis off.

The first clip an aeroplane was launched from a traveling ship was in May 1912, when commanding officer Charles Rumney Samson piloted a Short S.27 pontoon biplane from a incline on the deck of the HMS Hibernia in Weymouth Bay. However, the Hibernia wasn’t a true aircraft bearer, since planes couldn’t land on its deck ; they had to put down on the H2O and so be retrieved, decelerating the whole procedure well. The first existent aircraft bearer was the HMS Furious, which began life as a 786-foot-long conflict patrol car equipped with two monolithic 18-inch guns—until British naval interior decorators figured out that these guns were so big they might agitate the ship to pieces. Looking for another usage for the vas, they built a long platform capable of both establishing and set downing aeroplanes. To do more room for takeoffs and landings, the aeroplanes were stored in airdocks under the track, as they still are in modern aircraft bearers. Squadron Commander Edward Dunning became the first individual to set down a plane on a traveling ship when he landed a Sopwith Pup on the Furious on August 2, 1917.

The first pilotless drone was developed for the U.S. Navy in 1916 and 1917 by two discoverers, Elmer Sperry and Peter Hewitt, who originally designed it as an remote-controlled aerial bomb—essentially a paradigm sail missile. Measuring merely 18.5 pess across, with a 12-horsepower motor, the Hewitt-Sperry Automatic Aircraft weighed 175 lbs and was stabilized and directed ( “piloted” is excessively generous ) with gyroscopes and a barometer to find height. The first remote-controlled flight in history occurred on Long Island on March 6, 1918. In the terminal, the aiming technique—point and fly—was excessively imprecise for it to be utile against ships during the war. Further development, by trying to incorporate distant wireless control, continued for several old ages after the war, until the Navy lost involvement in 1925.

With 1000000s of soldiers enduring dangerous, dangerous hurts, there was evidently a immense demand during the Great War for the new admiration arm of medical nosologies, the X-ray—but these required really big machines that were both excessively bulky and excessively delicate to travel. Enter Marie Curie, who set to work making nomadic X-ray Stationss for the Gallic military instantly after the eruption of war ; by October 1914, she had installed X-ray machines in several autos and little trucks which toured smaller surgical Stationss at the forepart. By the terminal of the war there were 18 of these “radiologic cars” or “Little Curies” in operation. Afro-american discoverer Frederick Jones developed an even smaller portable X-ray machine in 1919 ( Jones besides invented infrigidation units, air conditioning units, and the self-starting gasolene lawnmower ) .

Women traditionally improvised all sorts of disposable or washable unmentionables to cover with their monthly period, all the manner back to softened papyrus in ancient Egypt. But the modern healthful serviette as we know it was made possible by the debut of new cellulose patch stuff during the First World War ; it wasn’t long earlier Gallic nurses figured out that clean, absorptive cellulose patchs were far superior to any predecessors. British and American nurses picked up on the wont, and corporate America wasn’t far behind: In 1920, Kimberly-Clark introduced the first commercial healthful serviettes, Kotex ( that’s “cotton” + “texture” ) . But it was unsmooth traveling at first, as no publications would transport advertizements for such a merchandise. It wasn’t until 1926 that Montgomery Ward broke the barrier, transporting Kotex serviettes in its popular catalogue.

Weapons of World War I

Rifles. All states used more than one type of piece during the First World War. The rifles most normally used by the major battlers were, among the Allies, the Lee-Enfield.303 ( Britain and Commonwealth ) , Lebel and Berthier 8mm ( France ) , Mannlicher-Carcano M1891, 6.5mm ( Italy ) , Mosin-Nagant M1891 7.62 ( Russia ) , and Springfield 1903.30–06 ( USA ) . The Cardinal Powers employed Steyr-Mannlicher M95 ( Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria ) , Mauser M98G 7.92mm ( Germany ) , and Mauser M1877 7.65mm ( Turkey ) . The American Springfield used a bolt-action design that so closely copied Mauser’s M1989 that the US Government had to pay a licensing fee to Mauser, a pattern that continued until America entered the war.

Flamethrowers. Reports of foot utilizing some kind of flamethrowing device can be found as far back as ancient China. During America’s Civil War some Southern newspapers claimed Abraham Lincoln had observed a trial of such a arm. But the first recorded usage of handheld flamethrowers in combat was on February 26, 1915, when the Germans deployed the arm at Malancourt, near Verdun. Tanks carried on a man’s back used N force per unit area to spray fuel oil, which was ignited as it left the muzzle of a little, hand-directed pipe. Over the class of the war, Germany utilized 3,000 Flammenwerfer military personnels ; over 650 flamethrower onslaughts were made. The British and Gallic both developed flamethrowing weapons but did non do such extended usage of them.

Artillery. The twentieth century’s most important spring in traditional weapons engineering was the increased deadliness of heavy weapon due to betterments in gun design, scope and ammunition‚—a fact that was all excessively clear in the Great War, when heavy weapon killed more people than any other arm did. Some elephantine guns could hurtle missiles so far that crews had to take into history the rotary motion of the Earth when plotting their fire. Among smaller field guns, the Gallic 75mm cannon developed a repute among their German oppositions as the “Devil Gun.” French commanding officers claimed it won the war. Gallic 75 mm field guns besides saw action in the Second World War, during which some were modified by the Germans into anti-tank guns with limited success.

Poison gas. On April 22, 1915, German heavy weapon fired cylinders incorporating Cl gas in the Ypres country, the beginning of gas onslaughts in the First World War. Other states raced to make their ain battleground gases, and both sides found ways to increase the badness and continuance of the gases they fired on enemy troop concentrations. Chlorine gas attacked the eyes and respiratory system ; mustard gas did the same but besides caused vesicating on any open tegument. Relatively few work forces died from gas. Most returned to active service after intervention, but the arm incapacitated big Numberss of military personnels temporarily and distribute panic wherever it was used. The usage of toxicant gas was outlawed by international jurisprudence following the war, but it has been used in some ulterior struggles, such as the Iran-Iraq War ( 1980–88 ) .

Tanks. Ideas for “land battleships” travel back at least every bit far as the Medieval Era ; programs for one are included among the drawings of Leonardo district attorney Vinci. The long-sought arm became world during the First World War. “Tank” was the name the British used as they in secret developed the arm, and it stuck, even though the Gallic at the same time developed the Renault RT visible radiation armored vehicle, which had a travelable turret, unlike the British designs. ( Assorted grounds have been given for taking the name “tank, ” from shells that were shaped like water-carriers to the British concealment building of their secret arm under the pretense of doing irrigation armored combat vehicles for sale to Russia. ) The first British armored combat vehicle ( “Little Willie” ) weighed about 14 dozenss, had a top velocity of three miles per hour, and broke down often. Improved armored combat vehicles were deployed during the war, but dislocations remained a important job that led many commanding officers to believe the armored combat vehicle would ne'er play a major function in warfare. The Germans developed an armoured combat vehicle merely in response to the British and Gallic deploying armored combat vehicles. The lone German design of the war, A7V, was an amazing but cumbrous animal that resembled a one-story edifice on paces.

Early on aircraft were flimsy, kite-like designs of lightweight wood, cloth and wires. The 80–120 HP engines used in 1914 produced top velocities of 100 miles per hour or less ; four old ages subsequently speed had about doubled. Protection for pilots remained elusive, but most pilots disdained transporting parachutes irrespective. Over the class of the war multi-engine bombers were developed, the largest being Germany’s “Giant” with a wingspread of 138 pess and four engines. It had a scope of about 500 stat mis and a bomb-load capacity of 4,400 lbs. , although in long-range operations, such as bombing London, Giants carried merely about half that much.

Submarines. Britain, France, Russia and the United States of America had all developed pigboat forces before Germany began development of its Unterzeeboats ( Undersea boats, or Submarines ) in 1906, but during World War I submarines came to be peculiarly associated with the Imperial German Navy, which used them to seek to bridge the spread in naval strength it suffered compared to Britain’s Royal Navy. Longer-range Submarines were developed and torpedo quality improved during the war. Submarines could strike unobserved from beneath the moving ridges with gunmans but besides surfaced to utilize their deck gun. One maneuver was for the low-riding bomber to steal in among a convoy of ships while surfaced, onslaught and honkytonk. An unsuccessful post-war attempt was made to censor pigboat warfare, as was done with toxicant gas.

World War 1 Facts For Kids | Fascinating Facts about WWI

The first is ever the most memorable. This is why, the First World War or once “The Great War” is a war that experts hail as one of the most important events in recent history. The war went on from 28 July 1914 up to 11 November 1918 and was between the Allies and the Central Powers of Germany, every bit good as Austria-Hungary. Once it was over and after an estimated organic structure count of 9 million, the Allies won and the remainder, as we all say, is history. Despite the fact that portion of history or societal surveies is to educate kids, adolescents and grownups likewise about the First World War, some instructors tend to go forth out a few merriment facts.


The Germans had closely observed the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-1905 and took note that howitzers and grenades, considered militarily disused back so, were used to great consequence against the entrenched enemy, with grenade throwers hurtling their grenades into enemy trenches so that back uping foot could ramp the trenches and wipe up up any subsisters. Although their military contrivers were n't visualizing a stagnant entrenched front stretching 100s of stat mis, the Germans did expect laying besieging to Gallic fortresses, and grenades would be really utile in this respect. Consequently, when they went to war in 1914, the German 's had 10s of 1000s of manus grenades and even more rifle grenades.

The British high bid, used to colonial wars and non a general war, could n't see much usage for the things. The lone grenade available was the Mark I, which had an explosive case shot with a percussion fuse attached to a 16-inch grip with streamers to guarantee it landed canister-down and therefore detonate, hopefully in the enemy trench. The job was that, one time the pin was pulled, it was armed and would detonate every bit shortly as it struck something. Too many times, in the confined infinite of a trench, that something was the rear wall of their ain trench. Thus, many Tommies ( British soldiers ) distrusted the Mark I and applied scientists came up with an interim solution -- a grenade that could be whipped up at the forepart.

The solution was known as the “jam-tin” double-cylinder grenade, fashioned from two sizes of empty Sns ( tins ) readily available at the forepart -- sometimes literally the Sn incorporating the soldier 's ration of jam. Gun-cotton or dynamite was placed in the smaller Sn, which was placed inside the larger Sn. Then pieces of metal, moving as shrapnel, were placed in the larger Sn around the smaller. A fuse, with a burn rate of about 1.25 seconds per inch, was inserted through the palpebra of the outer can which was so sealed. When used, the fuse would be lit, possibly by coffin nail, and the jam-tin thrown, detonating whenever the fuse reached the explosive. British armament companies, meanwhile, were feverishly working on existent grenades, but the jam-tin filled the spread until they appeared at the forepart. It was n't until May 1915, that the British introduced the Mills bomb, one of the best grenades of the war and would stay in service into the 1980s.


As with grenades, the Germans were besides ab initio armed with howitzers. Mortars were ( by and large ) portable and could fire unexposed from the underside of a trench, dropping their shells into the enemy trenches with a small fortune. Mortars are basically hollow tubings angled greater than 45 grades. A howitzer shell is dropped down the tubing where the base of the shell strikes a fire pin, puting off the shell 's propellent and hiting the shell up, over and about straight down on an enemy place. Neither the Gallic or the British had howitzers at the start of the war. The Gallic really scrounged up Napoleonic-era howitzers more than a century old until modern howitzers became available.


By the terminal of 1914, snipers were the flagellum of the trenches. New recruits had to be invariably told to non jab their caputs over the top to “have a look” . Many were killed that manner. The periscope rifle was created to let the taw to fire his rifle without exposing his caput. A wooden frame was constructed such that it would firmly keep the rifle above the taw with the top of the periscope aligned with the gun-sites, leting the soldier to take by looking through the bottom portion of the periscope. To fire the rifle, a twine was pulled. Though non every bit effectual as when aimed usually, it was still really utile. Periscope rifles were used extensively during the 1915 Gallipoli run, where the ANZAC ( Australian and New Zealand Army Corps ) were invariably overlooked by Turkish places on higher land.

Melee Weapons

When soldiers managed to acquire across the deathly land of No Man 's Land, the subsisters had to come in the enemy trenches and fight manus to manus. Their long rifles, even longer with bayonets attached, were ill-suited in the confines of the trenches, and normally merely officers had handguns. Many learned to improvize and weapons that would hold been familiar to Medieval soldiers were utilised during the close combat in the trenches. Such trench busting weapons as trench knives, trench nines ( often-times weighted with lead and studded with nails ) , pickaxe grips, tomahawks, brass brass knuckss, intrenching tools, spades and Maces were all used to horrific consequence on both sides.


5th September 1914 First Battle of the Marne begins. 9th September 1914 First Battle of the Masurian Lakes begins. 10th September 1914 First Battle of the Marne ends in a Gallic Victory, therefore holding the German progress towards Paris, which consequences in deadlock. 14th September 1914 Russia loses the First Battle of Masurian Lakes. First Battle of Aisne Begins. Military personnels starts to build trenches across the full length of the western forepart. 17th September 1914 Austro-German forces launch an onslaught into western Poland 5th September 1915 Tsar Nicholas takes bids of Russian ground forcess. 15th September 1915 British forces use gas in conflict near Loos, but switching air currents cause 60,000 British casualties. 22nd September 1915 The Second Battle of Champagne Begins. 15th September 1916 Tanks introduced for the first clip on the Somme battleground by the British. 20th September 1916 Russia 's Brusilov offense in Carpathia comes to an terminal, holding about knocked Austria-Hungary out of the war. 1st September 1917 German troops interrupt through the northmost terminal of the Russian forepart during the Riga violative. 19th September 1918 The British begin an violative against Turkish forces in Palestine, the Battle of Megiddo. 26th September 1918 The Battle of the Vardar is fought against the Bugarians by Serb, Czech, Italian, French and British forces. The Meuse-Argonne violative Begins. this wll be the concluding Franco-American offense of the war. 28th September 1918 Belgian forces launch an violative at Ypres. 29th September 1918 Bulgaria concludes armistice dialogues with the Allies.

Weapons World War One

World War One had been the initial truly entire world-wide war, a titanic battle between the so major world powers for the control of Europe every bit good as other parts that they had colonized in the Nineteenth century. Despite such high bets, the start of the war was welcomed with important popular enthusiasm in legion ­ if non wholly – topographic points. After many old ages of sabre­rattling and boosting weaponries races every bit good as escalating economic and geopolitical competitions, it had been believed, non simply by warmongers, that a brief, clean struggle would convey a fresh balance to world personal businesss.

Artillery was deployed on a majority degree to pulverize profoundly dug trenches and munitions, machine guns grown to their annihilating extremum against close formations of assailing soldiers ; dismaying, fresh created armored combat vehicles were used to acquire rid of the deadlock on the Western Front ; armoured battlewagons were sailed on a grade ne'er seen earlier or after ; planes turned out both valuable for heavy weapon staining, and as a consequence for air-to-air combat, pigboats were for the first juncture employed to torpedo rival transportation, significantly sabotaging Britain’s ability to pay war ; while Zeppelin airships moved the war to the place forepart, dropping bombs on British metropoliss.

When World War One was over following good over 4 old ages of awful combat, where the concluding consequence was questionable until the shutting stages of candidacy, a little figure of people were really in a place, to understand the arrant grade of the lay waste toing occasions they had seen. Empires were destroyed, new states had appeared and the United States had been turned into a planetary giant. Regardless of the important deceases, the victors might at least console themselves with the belief that they had triumphed in ‘the war to stop all wars’ – the widely used statement of the name of H G Wells’s highly optimistic 1914 book entitled The War That Will End War. However the peace they had won. at such tremendous monetary value was ephemeral and it was destined to last merely 20 old ages.

See other essay on:

essay on sarmientos the city and the countryside , essay on pet animals parrot, essay on television an idiot box, essay on there is no place like home , essay on child labor laws, essay on exhibition in my school, essay on self esteem and academic achievement, essay on picnic at hanging rock, essay on 9/11 , essay on the topic newspaper , essay on increased life expectancy, essay on stress , essay on economic globalization , essay on why should we save water, essay on excellence in education , essay on macbeths , essay on risk in stock market trading, essay on 1984 by george orwell, essay on ethical issues in counselling, essay on use and misuse of nuclear energy , essay on barack obama victory speech, essay on paying attention , essay on parrot bird in marathi, essay on courtesy spring from kindness of heart, essay on langston hughes life, essay on psycho the film , essay on changing role of women in society, essay on famous mathematicians , essay on phlogiston , essay on teenagers and drugs, essay on world war 2 causes , essay on the pearl novel , essay on a rose for emily symbolism, essay on facility management , essay on native american environmental issues, essay on junk food for kids, essay on why do i deserve this scholarship, essay on the bad effects of marijuana, essay on hiccups , essay on sportsmanship spirit , essay on godhra kand , essay on visit to nainital, essay on exhibition of books, essay on britishness , essay on the theme of the lottery by shirley jackson, essay on qutub minar for kids, essay on old english vocabulary, essay on i know why the caged , essay on first day experience in school, essay on picture , essay on lion in english, essay on how the world will be in 2050, essay on natural law , essay on bipolar disorder in children, essay on causes of juvenile crime and solutions, essay on the aim of your life, essay on littering , essay on environmental pollutants , essay on bunking of classes, essay on the violin